 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||
This debate is about Martin's 1996 article, "The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God" (TANG), which attempts to reverse the claims of the transcendental argument given by presuppositionalist apologists. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God demonstrates God's existence by showing that knowledge itself would be impossible if the Christian God did not exist.
The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God by Michael Martin
A Brief Response to Michael Martin's "Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God" by John M. Frame (Off Site)
A Response to John Frame's Rebuttal of The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God by Michael Martin
A Second Response to Martin (Off Site)
Response to Frame's Second Response by Michael Martin
A Third Response to Martin (Off Site)
Response to Frame's Third Response by Michael Martin
Frame's Final Response (Off Site)
Final Response to Frame by Michael Martin
By mutual agreement, Martin has been given the closing word.
|
[ e-mail the URL of this page ]
[top of page]
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Copyright© Internet Infidels® 1995-Present. All rights reserved.
|
